Evidence-Based Practice: ASK - PICO
This guide is designed to assist health care professionals to become effective and efficient users of the medical and nursing literature.
Evidence-Based Practice: Navigation
EBP Home | Pre-Reqs: Before you Dive in ... Learn About the Medical Literature | Introduction to EBP in 6 Steps | AJN's EBP Series | ASK - PICO | Levels of Evidence and Study Designs | SEARCH EBP Tools & Pyramid | EBP Tools Table | Literature Review | Getting to Fulltext | APPRAISE-Critical Appraisal | DISSEMINATE - Writing for Publication
Other EBP Guides, Tutorials, Terms | RN Residency Teaching Activities | How to Identify Peer-Reviewed Journals
PICO Tools
* The Underappreciated and Misunderstood PICOT Question: A Critical Step in the EBP Process. [Article]
* How to Create a Well-Built Clinical Question - from NLM
* PICO and Search Query Worksheet [pdf] from Ebling Library - University of Wisconsin-Madison
Background vs. Foreground Questions
When to use PICO ...
Background questions concern general knowledge. These types of questions generally have only 2 parts:
1) A question root (who, what, when, where, how, why) and
2) a disorder, test, treatment, or other aspect of health care.
Often these questions can best be answered by using a textbook or consulting a clinical database.
Example Background Question: What are the best interventions to prevent accidental falls in the elderly?
Foreground questions are specific knowledge questions that affect clinical decisions, including a broad range of biologic, psychological, and sociologic issues. These are the questions that generally require a search of the primary medical literature and that are best suited to the PICO format.
PICO Search
PICO
What is the P.I.C.O. Model?
Defining a clinical question in terms of the specific patient problem aids the searcher in finding clinically relevant evidence in the literature.
Essentially, PICO is a focused search strategy.
P-I-C-O Model for Clinical Questions
P | Patient, Population, or Problem | How would I describe a group of patients similar to mine? |
I | Intervention, Prognostic Factor, or Exposure | Which main intervention, prognostic factor, or exposure am I considering? |
C | Comparison or Intervention (if appropriate) | What is the main alternative to compare with the intervention? |
O | Outcome you would like to measure or achieve | What can I hope to accomplish, measure, improve, or affect? |
T | Time Interval | What is the time interval to achieve desired outcomes? |
What type of question are you asking? | Diagnosis, Etiology/Harm, Therapy, Prognosis, Prevention |
|
Type of study you want to find | What would be the best study design/methodology? |
Table based on: Evidence Based Medicine: PICO. UIC Library.
Example PICO Questions
Therapy / Intervention Example : In the elderly (P), does aspirin (I) reduce the risk of heart attacks (O)?
Intervention Example : In hospitalized adults (P), how does a Rapid Response Team (I) affect the number of cardiac arrests (O) and unplanned admissions to the ICU (O) during a 3-month period?
Diagnosis Example : In healthcare settings, does screening for intimate partner/domestic violence (I) improve quality-of-life (O) for women (P)?
Meaning Example : How do family caregivers (P) with relatives receiving hospice care (I) receive the loss of their loved one (O) during end-of-life (T)?
Comparative Intervention / Therapy Example : In patients with dementia who are agitated (P), how does baby doll therapy (I) compared with Risperdone drug therapy (C) affect behavior outbursts (O) within 1 month (T)?
Other question development frameworks
PICO is a helpful framework for clinical research questions, but may not be the best for other types of research questions. Did you know there are at least 25 other question frameworks besides variations of PICO? Frameworks like PEO, SPIDER, SPICE, ECLIPSE, and others can help you formulate a focused research question. The table and example below were created by the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Libraries.
PEO
The PEO question framework is useful for qualitative research topics. PEO questions identify three concepts: population, exposure, and outcome.
Element | Definition | Example |
---|---|---|
Population | Who is my question focused on? | mothers |
Exposure | What is the issue I am interested in? | postnatal depression |
Outcome | What, in relation to the issue, do I want to examine? | daily living experiences |
Research question: What are the daily living experiences of mothers with postnatal depression?
SPIDER
The SPIDER question framework is useful for qualitative or mixed methods research topics focused on "samples" rather than populations.
SPIDER questions identify five concepts: sample, phenomenon of interest, design, evaluation,and research type.
Element | Definition | Example |
---|---|---|
Sample | Who is the group of people being studied? | young parents |
Phenomenon of Interest | What are the reasons for behavior and decisions? | attendance at antenatal education classes |
Design | How has the research been collected (e.g., interview, survey)? | interviews |
Evaluation | What is the outcome being impacted? |
experiences |
Research type | What type of research (qualitative or mixed methods)? | qualitative studies |
Research question: What are the experiences of young parents in attendance at antenatal education classes?
SPICE
The SPICE question framework is useful for qualitative research topics evaluating the outcomes of a service, project, or intervention. SPICE questions identify five concepts: setting, perspective, intervention/exposure/interest, comparison, and evaluation.
Element | Definition | Example |
---|---|---|
Setting | Setting is the context for the question (where). | South Carolina |
Perspective | Perspective is the users, potential users, or stakeholders of the service (for whom). | teenagers |
Intervention / Interest / Exposure | Intervention is the action taken for the users, potential users, or stakeholders (what). | provision of Quit Kits to support smoking cessation |
Comparison | Comparison is the alternative actions or outcomes (compared to what). |
no support or "cold turkey" |
Evaluation | Evaluation is the result or measurement that will determine the success of the intervention (what is the result, how well). | number of successful attempts to give up smoking with Quit Kits compared to number of successful attempts with no support |
Research question: For teenagers in South Carolina, what is the effect of provision of Quit Kits to support smoking cessation on number of successful attempts to give up smoking compared to no support ("cold turkey")?
ECLIPSE
The ECLIPSE framework is useful for qualitative research topics investigating the outcomes of a policy or service. ECLIPSE questions identify six concepts: expectation, client group, location, impact, professionals, and service.
Element | Definition | Example |
---|---|---|
Expectation | What are you looking to improve or change? What is the information going to be used for? | to increase access to wireless internet in the hospital |
Client group | Who is the service or policy aimed at? | patients and families |
Location | Where is the service or policy located? | hospitals |
I mpact | What is the change in service or policy that the researcher is investigating? | clients have easy access to free internet |
Professionals | Who is involved in providing or improving the service or policy? | IT, hospital administration |
Service | What kind of service or policy is this? | provision of free wireless internet to patients |
Research question: How can I increase access to wireless internet for hospital patients?
Other Question Formats for Different Types of Reviews
Review Type |
Aim |
Question Format |
Question Example |
---|---|---|---|
Effectiveness |
To evaluate the effectiveness of a certain treatment/practice in terms of its impact on outcomes |
Population, Intervention, Comparator/s, Outcomes (PICO) [23] |
What is the effectiveness of exercise for treating depression in adults compared to no treatment or a comparison treatment? [69] |
Experiential (Qualitative) |
To investigate the experience or meaningfulness of a particular phenomenon |
Population, Phenomena of Interest, Context (PICo) [13] |
What is the experience of undergoing high technology medical imaging (such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging) in adult patients in high income countries? [70] |
Costs/Economic Evaluation |
To determine the costs associated with a particular approach/treatment strategy, particularly in terms of cost effectiveness or benefit |
Population, Intervention, Comparator/s, Outcomes, Context (PICOC) [14] |
What is the cost effectiveness of self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus in high income countries? [71] |
Prevalence and/or Incidence |
To determine the prevalence and/or incidence of a certain condition |
Condition, Context, Population (CoCoPop) [15] |
What is the prevalence/incidence of claustrophobia and claustrophobic reactions in adult patients undergoing MRI? [72] |
Diagnostic Test Accuracy |
To determine how well a diagnostic test works in terms of its sensitivity and specificity for a particular diagnosis |
Population, Index Test, Reference Test, Diagnosis of Interest (PIRD) [16] |
What is the diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools (such as the Malnutrition Screening Tool) compared to the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment amongst patients with colorectal cancer to identify undernutrition? [73] |
Etiology and/or Risk |
To determine the association between particular exposures/risk factors and outcomes |
Population, Exposure, Outcome (PEO) [17] |
Are adults exposed to radon at risk for developing lung cancer? [74] |
Expert opinion/policy |
To review and synthesize current expert opinion, text or policy on a certain phenomena |
Population, Intervention or Phenomena of Interest, Context (PICo) [18] |
What are the policy strategies to reduce maternal mortality in pregnant and birthing women in Cambodia, Thailand, Malaysia and Sri Lanka? [75] |
Psychometric |
To evaluate the psychometric properties of a certain test, normally to determine how the reliability and validity of a particular test or assessment. |
Construct of interest or the name of the measurement instrument(s), Population, Type of measurement instrument, Measurement properties [31, 32] |
What is the reliability, validity, responsiveness and interpretability of methods (manual muscle testing, isokinetic dynamometry, hand held dynamometry) to assess muscle strength in adults? [76] |
Prognostic |
To determine the overall prognosis for a condition, the link between specific prognostic factors and an outcome and/or prognostic/prediction models and prognostic tests. |
Population, Prognostic Factors (or models of interest), Outcome |
In adults with low back pain, what is the association between individual recovery expectations and disability outcomes? [77] |
Methodology |
To examine and investigate current research methods and potentially their impact on research quality. |
Types of Studies, Types of Data, Types of Methods, Outcomes [39] (SDMO) |
What is the effect of masked (blind) peer review for quantitative studies in terms of the study quality as reported in published reports? (question modified from Jefferson 2007) [40] |